GENDER AND SEXUALITY: Seriously, though. Who pays?

Recently, over at Brute Reason, there was a post about how feminism isn’t about who picks up the check after dinner.  She makes some great points in the piece, and it’s well worth reading.  That said, there is still the matter of who is expected to pay for a date.

The traditional proscription is that “the man pays.”  This, as you may have gathered, has several problems with it (many covered as well in the aforementioned Brute Reason piece).  For one thing, it’s quite a heteronormative thing, to assert that not only is there a man, but that “the man” is a position within a relationship.

Even if you overlook the implications of the statement, it becomes useless for couples who don’t fit into the monogamous, heterosexual paradigm.  What if the people in question are a lesbian couple?  There’s no man in that scenario to pay for their date.  How about two gay men?  Then we’ve got two men.  Are they supposed to pay for the other, for their own share, or do they both pay the full amount of the bill (quite a good deal for the venue in which they are dating)?  Carrying on, what if a non-monogamous group is going out on a date together?  There might be many men, or no men.  Oh, it’s so confusing.

Now, statistically, we’re probably dealing with a heterosexual couple.  Frankly, though, that doesn’t clear up the problem.  If the male partner in a heterosexual pair is expected to pay for every single date, that’s going to create quite a disparity.  On the one hand, it might make his female partner feel uncomfortable, being treated to dinner/a movie/an outing every time they’re together, since lots of people feel that they owe reciprocity to people who have given them things.  In most cases, this just means that you give a gift in return, or help that person out.  In a scenario in which only a man can pay for a date, though, reciprocity must come in another form, which can be attention, affection, or, most notoriously, sex.  So, to summarize, insisting that every single date must be paid for by the male half of a heterosexual couple can lead to his female companion feel pressured to act on feelings she doesn’t really have out of duty.

Another problem with “the man pays” command is that it burdens men.  Want to spend time with that nice young woman again?  I hope you’ve got $40 to spare.  Over the course of maybe a year and a half relationship, that can really add up.  In an age in which it was a safe assumption that men had money and women didn’t, I suppose that kind of works out, but when both partners are likely on similar footing, this seems needlessly burdensome.

Up until this point, we’ve been assuming the best of intentions, but this whole “the man pays” thing does open the door to potential exploitation on both sides.  Harkening back to the trouble of women feeling pressured, there is good reason for their apprehension.  There are plenty of men out there who would not hesitate to claim that they are owed a woman’s affection because they have paid for dinner.  On the other side of the coin, I imagine that there are plenty of women who will continue to see a man as long as he is still buying her things, but who are effectively just using him.

So, what is to be done about this?  Clearly, someone has to be paying for all these dinners, coffees, movies, rounds of mini-golf, etc.  You could always, you know, talk about it, which is, I know, a scary concept for a lot of people.  It’s your partner’s birthday?  Offer to take them out to dinner.  Has your partner had a rough day?  You can pay.  When the situations are reversed, they can cover the bill.  Make twice as much money as your partner?  Pay for dinner twice as often as they do.  What I’m trying to stress here is that one size fits all declarations about dating aren’t especially useful, except for one:  Do what works best for your situation.

1 Response to “GENDER AND SEXUALITY: Seriously, though. Who pays?”

  1. May 23, 2013 at 5:24 pm

    It’s remarkable for me to have a web site, which is good in support of my know-how. thanks admin

Leave a comment, or vomit up your weird little train of thought.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


  • RT @jjasonf: I recommend #LifeIsStrange because it is a game that encourages the player to feel empathy with characters and I think that's … 2 hours ago
  • Also, go away, Warren. My bestie is self-destructing, and my dear Kate is in need. This is not the time for you. #LifeIsStrange 2 hours ago
  • In #LifeIsStrange I ship Max/Kate and Chloe/Rachel. That is my headcannon, and it is gonna be stuck that way. 2 hours ago
  • Wait, so Jamie Dornan would do "The Fall," but he had to take a bunch of showers after seeing consensual kink? O.o 2 days ago
  • Okay, but really, can we agree that Scandinavia might not be the best parallel to the giant, irregular craziness of the United States? 2 days ago


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 28 other followers

%d bloggers like this: